Hip Resurfacing Vs Hip Replacement 2016

How does it compare to conventional hip replacement.

Hip resurfacing vs hip replacement 2016.

In a conventional hip replacement the pain from a diseased hip is relieved by replacing the ball and the socket. Since its fda approval in 2006 more than 3 000 hip. Hip resurfacing is a less invasive approach to hip replacement and involves removing only the affected portions of the hip joint. The birmingham hip resurfacing is the answer to younger patients with severe hip pain due to arthritis.

Hip resurfacing is a less invasive form of joint replacement surgery which is advised to only selected individuals. Hip resurfacing is an alternative technology to total hip replacement that is aimed at treating painful conditions of the hip in younger active patients. Importantly hip resurfacing needn t be looked at as a temporary procedure inevitably leading to hip replacement down the road. Additionally it also explores some of the possible advantages and disadvantages of hip resurfacing over hip replacement.

Unlike traditional hip replacement surgery resurfacing does not remove as much of your leg bone. Hip replacement alleviates pain by removing the affected bones and cartilage and replacing it with a prosthetic implant that imitates the function of the joint. This article talks about some of the major differences between hip resurfacing and total hip replacement.